>We have to assume people who are performing intelligent work are capable of nuance and discretion Which is why myself and many others in the industry would no

>We have to assume people who are performing intelligent work are capable of nuance and discretion Which is why myself and many others in the industry would not see a problem using different terms. I know I don't need to explain this to you, but we're in a constantly evolving industry subject to rapid change. It's something we're all accustom to so one more minor change, especially one that's inconsequential to the industry as a whole but significant to the people it affects, shouldn't be a point of contention. Our industry has always been focused on the future and part of that innovation is being able to let go of our fleeting past and keep moving forward.