4 ms·
You know I briefly looked in to it because I'm not dumb I understand it'd make this unstoppable, but there's very few options with very high prices. You never k
by TheMask01 6y ago
You know I briefly looked in to it because I'm not dumb I understand it'd make this unstoppable, but there's very few options with very high prices. You never know with what the future holds but yeah, not cheap. Definitely doable though.
The good thing about 'our' filtering is that it would take down the number of daily requests to their API, but still...a. lot. I wouldn't say it's out of the question even remotely, I have the funds but am cautious with my finances/investments. But you're right and I should definitely give it some serious though..
- edoceo 6y agoPR matters less these days but if you're going that route then maybe also pull Alexa, Ahrefs and Moz and the like (I've got a complete list somewhere)
- wtracy 6y agoThat strikes me as a good option for a future "professional" tier of the website.
- SimianLogic2 6y agoYou could just pull number of google results as a proxy. You have the link to the google search now, being able to sort or filter by that would weed out a lot of junk. Would also be nice to sort/filter by Wayback hits.