3 ms·
Thanks for the reply. This makes sense, however it does mean you will end up hiring mostly from low wage regions. Which may not be a bad thing for the company,
by dennisy 6y ago
Thanks for the reply.
This makes sense, however it does mean you will end up hiring mostly from low wage regions. Which may not be a bad thing for the company, however it will be for people in higher wage regions.
- kostarelo 6y agoIf you can afford to pay above the rate for those, then go for it. If not, I don't see a reason why worrying about them. That's like saying a company that primarily works on a smaller countrys' market, thus their revenue is much smaller, cannot afford to hire engineers from SF and that's hurting those engineers for some reason?
- verganileonardo 6y agoThis sounds like a positive consequence of that policy. People move to lower rage regions, they spend less time commuting, the have more money available for other expenses (as rent is not a big chunk of their income). In the end, this pushes to a decentralized workforce and may reduce the cost of living on highly populated areas (NYC or SF)