3 ms·
Again, this has nothing to do with software being always online or not. Great looking software existed long before the rise of everything being always online.
by somehnguy 6y ago
Again, this has nothing to do with software being always online or not.
Great looking software existed long before the rise of everything being always online.
- AnthonyMouse 6y ago> Again, this has nothing to do with software being always online or not. Only if by "nothing to do with" you ignore that it is the method by which development is funded. > Great looking software existed long before the rise of everything being always online. At which time you had to pay a lot of money for it. If everybody gave the same money to free software developers, they'd have plenty of resources to build interfaces that are more to your satisfaction.
- somehnguy 6y agoYour entire premise is flawed imo. >If everybody gave the same money to free software developers, they'd have plenty of resources to build interfaces that are more to your satisfaction. You're just arguing to pay for software, but in a more roundabout way. And again, great looking software existed far before the popularity rise in always-online.