> Plenty have said they're fine paying the same or more for access to less content. Really? I haven't seen anyone say they want to pay more for less content. T

> Plenty have said they're fine paying the same or more for access to less content. Really? I haven't seen anyone say they want to pay more for less content. The unspoken assumption always seems to be "if I was getting fewer channels I'd be paying less", logic which works fine for tangible goods, but less so for ones with nearly zero marginal cost to produce.