I know what you're saying, but where do you think you are? Please have enough common sense to assume I asked the question knowing how that works. The primary t

I know what you're saying, but where do you think you are? Please have enough common sense to assume I asked the question knowing how that works. The primary thing with this bill that the companies seem explicitly quiet on is the fact that the use case it opens up for the government (sidestepping user privacy/encryption) coupled with the level of power it more or less places in the Attorney General's hands. I can't in good faith assume that these companies are comfortable with this, and I'd like to know why they're not speaking up.