> Then the platforms that host social media need to stop suppressing speech. They clearly state in their ToS that speech is limited on their platform. > His r

> Then the platforms that host social media need to stop suppressing speech. They clearly state in their ToS that speech is limited on their platform. > His response was to suspend their protection from liability lawsuits under 230. Well, his response was to state he was "looking to see if he could suspend their protection". There is nothing to be worried here, because anyone can tell him that the answer is that he can't suspend their protection. It was just infantile bluffing that in most other situations would cause the person bluffing to lose face, but not in the current political reality. In most situations, it's best to not state orders that you can't possible enforce and that reveal your weakness.