5 ms·
I reached out to my representatives on this when the Act was first proposed. I'm confused about the changes that have happened since that time and the post does
by sailfast 6y ago
I reached out to my representatives on this when the Act was first proposed. I'm confused about the changes that have happened since that time and the post does not say anything about what has changed. What does "Advancing" mean in this case? If I have already contacted all of my legislators about strong encryption and opposition to this bill, what is the latest change that requires re-engaging?
- pfranz 6y agoI haven't followed the specifics, either, but it looks like it was introduced back in March. When I reached out to my Senators and Reps back then I got a reply from my House Rep (who I believe was supportive of the bill). The bill is currently in the Senate and only this week is getting "marked up" in the Judiciary Committee--I imagine if your Senator is on that committee it's more important to reach out. Sadly, I think issues need constant re-engaging since they pop up under different names and in different forms.
- suizi 6y agoThe latest version now involves State law so if one State out of 50 decides encryption is bad for children they can go after any company in the U.S. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/07/new-earn-it-bill-still-threatens-encryption-and-free-speech https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/07/new-earn-it-bill-still...