3 ms·
Legislation that has any kind of a racial (or perceived to be racial) aspect to it cannot really be discussed freely. Even though closing such loopholes may be
by mistermann 6y ago
Legislation that has any kind of a racial (or perceived to be racial) aspect to it cannot really be discussed freely. Even though closing such loopholes may be perfectly legitimate, if exploitation of the loophole happens to correlate to a racially identifiable group, in the current age of social media based hyper propaganda it is a very dangerous political move for a career politician (or their party) to touch.
- foogazi 6y agoIs that why they have not closed the loophole or are you speculating? Weren’t they talking about taxing vacant properties in Vancouver recently? Was there social media backlash?
- mistermann 6y agoThere were significant quantities of racism accusations in social and mainstream media, as there also had been for years during the money laundering in casinos debacle, that most politicians and right thinking news reporters also wouldn't touch. Who knows what's really true, but there sure seem to be a lot of correlative coincidences, with similar stories in many different countries.
- numakerg 6y agoEven if that's the case (and I disagree that it is), I'm sure there are "satellite families" with the breadwinner working in Europe.
- mistermann 6y agoAnd I doubt there'd be an issue with racism making people reluctant to discuss the issue if they were the majority of the cases.