15 ms·
It's certainly no less AI than natural language processing is -- both seek to use algorithmic approaches to resolve the ambiguities in a bunch of input captured
by jimwise 16y ago
It's certainly no less AI than natural language processing is -- both seek to use algorithmic approaches to resolve the ambiguities in a bunch of input captured from fuzzy real-world sources, and build data structures representing that data -- as best understood by the program -- that can be manipulated by more traditional processing algorithms.
- quantombone 16y agoI agree that NLP is no less AI than vision. What I wanted to point out in my post (I am the author) is that too many smart computer vision researchers don't view vision as AI at all. Somehow many people's research program is centered around the assumption/desire that a pure image classification approach will solve vision.
- alantrrs 16y agoComputer Vision is in fact (according to Shapiro[1]) AI-complete, meaning that the solving this problems is equivalent to solving the central artificial intelligence problem. It is in my opinion one of the hardest problems to solve that is why Researchers have to focus on a tiny specific topic in computer vision. 1. http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~shapiro/Papers/ai.pdf http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~shapiro/Papers/ai.pdf