4 ms·
See also: the Hippocratic License 2.1 "An Ethical License for Open Source Projects" https://firstdonoharm.dev/ https://firstdonoharm.dev/ "prohibits the redist
by thinkingemote 6y ago
See also: the Hippocratic License 2.1 "An Ethical License for Open Source Projects" https://firstdonoharm.dev/ https://firstdonoharm.dev/
"prohibits the redistribution of the software in modified, derivative, or collected work form from being relicensed to any individual or organization which directly or indirectly facilitates, encourages, manipulates, coerces, or forces people to engage in behaviors that are in conflict with the rights enumerated in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights."
- sgift 6y agoEspecially the "indirectly" part is probably something everyone can be guilty of if you search long enough. So, a great license if you want no one to use whatever you write. No idea why you even bother licensing it then, but to each their own.
- thinkingemote 6y agoagreed. The atmosphere license seems to have better wording "...materially and directly invested..."
- PixyMisa 6y agoThe Universal Declaration of Human Rights prohibits speaking out against the actions of the United Nations (Article 29 paragraph 3), so it is in conflict with itself.