Nope it was a completely honest question and what I considered a constructive line of thought. You should assume good faith. I asked about two competing definit

Nope it was a completely honest question and what I considered a constructive line of thought. You should assume good faith. I asked about two competing definitions of what is racist and you seemed to prefer one over the other. And what have I claimed to "easily refute" exactly? More like I ran with the definition, and considered how to address the problem as stated. I said more features were needed, I didn't say enough features were currently used. You keep pointing to a dichotomy between perfect and flawed, while I was talking about relative improvements. There isn't even necessarily a disagreement there.