3 ms·
It only takes a few minutes of use and comparison to understand that today's LibreOffice doesn't even come close to touching the level of polish and user-friend
by forgotmypw17 6y ago
It only takes a few minutes of use and comparison to understand that today's LibreOffice doesn't even come close to touching the level of polish and user-friendliness of Word 98 (Mac) or Word 97 (Windows).
- ImprovedSilence 6y agoyeah but their spreadsheet blows the pants off of whatever garbage macOS trys to pass off as an Excel replacement.
- karoofish 6y agomacOS, being an operating system does not have spreadsheet. If you looking for a spreadsheet on macOS, Microsoft Office is available and provides Excel.
- AnthonyMouse 6y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbers_(spreadsheet) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbers_(spreadsheet)
- vetinari 6y agoTo be fair, Numbers/Pages/Keynote, as well as Garageband and iMovie are not a part of macOS. Yes, they come preinstalled with a new Mac, but if you do a clean installaction, they will be missing. You will have to reinstall them from App Store.
- stOneskull 6y agothe libreoffice spreadsheet is very good. i think it's psychic sometimes, knowing what i want to do.
- grawprog 6y agoI'm guessing this whole section of the thread went over a few people's heads....hn always does have a bit of a problem detecting ironic sarcasm...
- notkaiho 6y agoAnd yet I've seen more than one thread comment say the humanities and media literacy are "not worth teaching"
- forgotmypw17 6y agoI wasn't being sarcastic. I still use Word 97 for writing, because in Word 97, it always takes me two keystrokes to save a new document (Ctrl+S, Enter), whlie in LibreOffice it is an exercise in frustration, because every new document is titled Untitled 1, and that causes a problem when I've already saved Untitled 1. This is just one example of a basic feature, used on a regular basis, which has obviously been tested thoroughly by the Office 97 developers, but has seemingly barely received any attention from LibreOffice. I use a very basic laptop, and through the wonders of virtualization have a Windows ME VM with Office 97 on it, and it runs just as fast as LibreOffice does natively, if not faster. In a VM, being used for an hour or two at a time, Win ME has no stability issues. Win ME came with IE 5.5, and I eventually upgraded it to 6.0. Because I built my site to be compatible with both, I can easily copy and paste what I wrote into my blog. Office 97 and IE 6.0 support Unicode well enough that I can do all this in two different character sets. I rarely print anything, and I'd probably still use LibreOffice for that. But if I really wanted to, I could probably figure out how to print, too. The Win 9x series is remembered for being unstable and crashy, but I think it's also a marvel of engineering and UI design. And when you take away malware, random utilities, registry decay, hardware malfunctions, and so on, it's a comfortable, almost typewriter-like experience.
- grawprog 6y agoWhoops my bad. I was reading all the other comments here in response to this and I responded to yours. I can't disagree. Older versions of word were a lot more stable than newer versions. About the Ctrl-s thing, maybe it's specific to windows, I use libre office on linux and have for years and Ctrl-s on a new document has always brought up the save-as dialog for me. Either way, I'd rather use an older version of word or libreoffice over new versions of office. I grew up using older windows, I don't really remember it being overly good or bad, it just kind of was. I remember lots of crashes, but used to do a lot of things I probably shouldn't have been and I do remember it working for everything I tried to do so I don't really have any complaints really. I don't really have any fond nostalgia either though to be honest. I stopped using windows entirely outside work over a decade ago so none of it really matters all that much to me.
- jacobolus 6y agoAnd sadly, both Word 98 and Word 2019 (any platform) are still far behind Word 5.1 (Mac; 1992).