4 ms·
There is some confusion here, I'll agree. I made the argument earlier in this thread that not only do we have no tests to prove or disprove theism, we cannot h
by randallsquared 18y ago
There is some confusion here, I'll agree.
I made the argument earlier in this thread that not only do we have no tests to prove or disprove theism, we cannot have any such tests, because theism and atheism are statements about what's beyond our (philosophical) universe. Any god you can formulate a test for isn't really God-the-Creator-of-All in the first place.
So, belief in God, or the lack thereof, is just an assumption. This assumption will influence your actions, of course, and belief or the absence of it may well be beneficial or harmful. Either you live your life as if God exists, or you don't. If you don't, you might as well call yourself an atheist... and that's why I do.
- icey 18y agoThe difference is subtle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnostic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnostic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism And largely an exercise in classification. Still, it's handy knowledge to have, should you enjoy that sort of thing.