4 ms·
Is the biggest takeaway from why Myspace cratered really that they migrated their technology to a .NET stack? That seems ridiculous to me. The being in L.A. t
by m0nastic 16y ago
Is the biggest takeaway from why Myspace cratered really that they migrated their technology to a .NET stack?
That seems ridiculous to me.
The being in L.A. thing might be less ridiculous, but I also find it hard to believe that there aren't boatloads of developers in L.A. who couldn't add value to a social networking site.
The reasons that come to mind for why Facebook initially started to attract users away from Myspace are that its profile pages didn't look like the Trapper-Keeper of a 14 year old, and the fact that it had exclusivity from being associated with Universities.
edit(I forgot this one as well): Also the shift from having to seek out your friend's pages to having their updates show up on your main page seemed like a big differentiator.
You can chalk the enhancements made to Facebook after that point to their underlying technology, but I really don't think ASP.NET was responsible for why Myspace sucked.
- jordan0day 16y agoAgreed -- even the technology problems he mentioned seem to have a lot more to do with MySpace's own architecture than the underlying platform. That said, I think he could have better put it by saying he thought MySpace needed rock star developers, and that they had a harder time getting rock star .NET devs. I'm still not sure that's actually true, but at least it's a little more reasonable. Anyway, I'm pretty sure Facebook was already eating MySpace's lunch before they even made the asp.net switch. Maybe not in pure numbers, but definitely in momentum. Edit: Not that I think MySpace needed rock star developers, just my take of what Scoble was trying to say.