3 ms·
IIRC L3 is slightly slower on Zen 2, main memory as mentioned much slower. Clock speed advantage -- Most Zen 2 CPUs don't overclock to 4.5 GHz on any core, let
by blattimwind 6y ago
IIRC L3 is slightly slower on Zen 2, main memory as mentioned much slower.
Clock speed advantage -- Most Zen 2 CPUs don't overclock to 4.5 GHz on any core, let alone all-core. The boost numbers are reached with current firmware, but only for tiniest fractions of a second and never under any real load. Sustained single-core boost frequencies are 200-400 MHz lower than the specified boost frequency. On the other hand, Intel CPUs consistently reach their boost frequencies under load, and most CPUs can do their single-core boost as an all-core overclock under load (with much greater power consumption of course).
In practice this means that for equivalently priced parts (e.g. 3900X vs 10900K) the AMD part will have about a GHz lower clock for lightly threaded workloads, which are most workloads. With Intel settings, the Intel and AMD parts have about the same sustained clocks (3.8-4 GHz) under all-core load, but with the defaults of many motherboards the Intel part will run at 4.8-5 GHz, depending on the cooling.
- gruez 6y ago>In practice this means that for equivalently priced parts (e.g. 3900X vs 10900K) the AMD part will have about a GHz lower clock for lightly threaded workloads They're only "equivalently priced" when you're talking about MSRP. Right now the 3900X sells for $413 and is in stock, whereas the i9-10900k sells for $530 and is out of stock.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]