3 ms·
The other person who replied to you probably paid half or a third of what you would pay for an equivalent Mac Pro. The profit margins on the Mac Pro are just i
by coder543 6y ago
The other person who replied to you probably paid half or a third of what you would pay for an equivalent Mac Pro.
The profit margins on the Mac Pro are just incredible. (Yes, I'm sure that equivalent professional workstation brands also have huge profit margins... no, that doesn't make me want to pay those lofty prices more.)
The only real value the Mac Pro provides is that it's the most powerful computer you're allowed to run macOS on legitimately. If you can do your work from Windows (with WSL) or Linux, you can save upwards of tens of thousands of dollars by building your own workstation, and that workstation can be significantly more powerful than any current Mac Pro at the same time.
For video professionals who rely on FCPX or similar macOS-only software, they don't really have a choice, and they get the opportunity to essentially pay $10k to $20k just for a license of macOS, which is fun.
- systemvoltage 6y agoI have a hackintosh (i7-8700k) and it feels about 2x faster than the top spec $4000 macbook pro latest 2019 model (subjective opinion ofcourse). It is such a huge difference, especially when using PyCharm and Adobe apps. It is pricey but if it is something you want to buy for 5 years, it is about $100/month cost. Some people might want to buy it.
- jeff_vader 6y ago"The other person who replied" here. While it definitely costs a lot less - you also need to factor in the time you spend on selecting components, building and tweaking thermals. It's almost a small side hobby for a month or two.