4 ms·

>I explicitly wrote 'NATO members' You did. But you did it in a very snarky and condescending way that implied the parent commenter was an idiot. Frankly, you

by mthoms 6y ago

>I explicitly wrote 'NATO members' You did. But you did it in a very snarky and condescending way that implied the parent commenter was an idiot. Frankly, you sound a little too "wound up" to have a civilized discussion with. Even if you do have a couple semi-valid points. Edit: You know what? I just glanced at your comment history. It's chock full of the same childishness. I'm going to disengage here.

deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
gdy 6y ago
It's puzzling that you've decided to write this after reading a measured and polite comment with what I think are reasonable arguments.
lovelyviking 6y ago
>Frankly, you sound a little too "wound up" to have a civilized discussion with. Even if you do have a couple semi-valid points. Very healthy reaction to russian propaganda. They usually act in a semi-valid points to slowly deliver 'lie-point' that have nothing to do with the reality. It's difficult to catch them with direct lie, but you see their signature in a mile after some experience. I went to look for the history of this guy just after reading one-line comment and sure enough I have found more examples of what I've suspected. >It's chock full of the same childishness Here I think, while it's indeed childishness, the threat of it not childish at all and I think underestimated. It's very dangerous propaganda weapon that proven to work well for Russian aggression for some time now. I wish people like you would take that into account and see threat for what it is.
- gdy 6y ago
  "semi-valid points to slowly deliver 'lie-point' that have nothing to do with the reality" You are welcome to provide counterpoints, that's how "civilized discussion" works.
  - lovelyviking 6y ago
    Frankly, you sound a little too "wound up" to have a civilized discussion with. Even if you do have a couple semi-valid points. You know what? I just glanced at your comment history. It's chock full of the same childishness. I'm going to disengage here.
    - gdy 6y ago
      Are both of you using the same handbook of internet trolls?

by mthoms 6y ago

deleted 6y ago

[deleted]

gdy 6y ago

It's puzzling that you've decided to write this after reading a measured and polite comment with what I think are reasonable arguments.

lovelyviking 6y ago

>Frankly, you sound a little too "wound up" to have a civilized discussion with. Even if you do have a couple semi-valid points. Very healthy reaction to russian propaganda. They usually act in a semi-valid points to slowly deliver 'lie-point' that have nothing to do with the reality. It's difficult to catch them with direct lie, but you see their signature in a mile after some experience. I went to look for the history of this guy just after reading one-line comment and sure enough I have found more examples of what I've suspected. >It's chock full of the same childishness Here I think, while it's indeed childishness, the threat of it not childish at all and I think underestimated. It's very dangerous propaganda weapon that proven to work well for Russian aggression for some time now. I wish people like you would take that into account and see threat for what it is.

gdy 6y ago
"semi-valid points to slowly deliver 'lie-point' that have nothing to do with the reality" You are welcome to provide counterpoints, that's how "civilized discussion" works.
- lovelyviking 6y ago
  Frankly, you sound a little too "wound up" to have a civilized discussion with. Even if you do have a couple semi-valid points. You know what? I just glanced at your comment history. It's chock full of the same childishness. I'm going to disengage here.
  - gdy 6y ago
    Are both of you using the same handbook of internet trolls?