4 ms·
Whenever I've seen it used or had to use a fizzbuzz-type question as an interviewer, it has always been stated that it's a warm-up question for which a straight
by ThrowawayR2 6y ago
Whenever I've seen it used or had to use a fizzbuzz-type question as an interviewer, it has always been stated that it's a warm-up question for which a straightforward implementation is fine. People who are senior get a harder warm-up question but the same reassurance is given.
- kristopolous 6y agoWhat does that mean even? Are we saying "advanced" as in you contribute to gcc and kernels or advanced as in you can do JavaScript without jQuery? I have no idea anymore. If someone tossed me a 6502 assembly book (in case the candidate didn't know it) and a simulator and told me to implement fizzbuzz in that and create some test script, now we're talking. You never work with 6502? Even better! That's every new job: a bunch of new stuff. We leave the amorphous world where there's giant stratas of assessments and opinions and have a concrete problem