3 ms·
Maybe. But in the latest Cra1g Wr1ght drama, he claimed to the court that some early addresses people thought might have been Satoshi's belonged to him. A messa
by Jach 6y ago
Maybe. But in the latest Cra1g Wr1ght drama, he claimed to the court that some early addresses people thought might have been Satoshi's belonged to him. A message surfaced afterwards which was signed with those addresses calling Cra1g a liar.
- centimeter 6y agoThe addresses used there were not Satoshi addresses, but other addresses mined around the same time.
- sukilot 6y agoWhy would Craig (falsely) claim to own not-Satoshi addresses, instead of claiming Satoshi addresses that are less likely to be used (due to exposure risk)?
- stale2002 6y agoSo the reason why Craig would do this is simple. Craig is not only a fraud, but is also an incompetent fraud.
- Jach 6y agoI think it's more correctly stated that it's not public knowledge if they were mined by Satoshi or not. One can say they were not part of the "Satoshi miner pattern" that was identified years ago, but we don't know exactly how many of the blocks mined outside that pattern were or were not Satoshi's. Hence my "might".