3 ms·
I fear it might be even worse than that. But first let me clarify: I'm not against people using technology to augment their natural capabilities. On the contrar
by elmo2you 6y ago
I fear it might be even worse than that. But first let me clarify: I'm not against people using technology to augment their natural capabilities. On the contrary.
However, I see a big risk in how this could cause a trend of less qualified (cheaper) lifeguards, hired by people who might feel more pressure regarding budgets than actual safety (probably lands mostly on the "lifeguards" neck anyways).
Considering how everything these days is run with a (often bad) cost/benefit analysis, I'm everything but positive about the "unforeseen" side effects of AI in this field.
As difficult as it is to spot a single drowning person in a sea of people (no pun intended), it might in fact be partly the feeling of sole responsibility that keeps (good) lifeguards as alert as they often are. I'm not so sure that AI will have a positive sum effect on that.
- Tade0 6y agoHowever, I see a big risk in how this could cause a trend of less qualified (cheaper) lifeguards A lifeguard is currently already a minimum-wage job. Also there's a ton of seasonal workers who aren't exactly that qualified to begin with.
- dahfizz 6y agoI was a lifeguard in high school, and I can assure you they are already very cheap to hire. To be red cross certified was a class one night a week for maybe a month or two, and I got hired at the YMCA for under $10/hr