I think that the first sentence in GP is a “quiet, personal and respectful” statement of a personal experience. I doubt any reader had an issue with it. The se

I think that the first sentence in GP is a “quiet, personal and respectful” statement of a personal experience. I doubt any reader had an issue with it. The second sentence in contrast asserts that science “dies not look deep into life processes”. This is an objective (as in non subjective, not necessarily true) statement about science without an explanation or justification to support it, and can easily be interpreted as a blanket anti-scientific position. The latter is quite unpopular on HN and is likely to attract downvotes.