3 ms·
Meh. So basically you're asking for "not Lisp"? There are plenty of languages which fill that role already. See: many modern languages which have a functional
by ldh 16y ago
Meh. So basically you're asking for "not Lisp"? There are plenty of languages which fill that role already.
See: many modern languages which have a functional influence but more syntax (Scala, Ruby, Groovy, etc., etc.)
- fxj 16y agothank you both for proving my point.