> If A is not not proven, it doesn't mean it is proven; it can still be a hypothesis. Are you sure? It seems to me if A is not not-proven, it is surely proven

> If A is not not proven, it doesn't mean it is proven; it can still be a hypothesis. Are you sure? It seems to me if A is not not-proven, it is surely proven. If A is still just a hypothesis, then it is not-proven, and isn't not not proven.