> That person replaced gun with manhood implying that the person's manhood is derived from them power-tripping with weapons. That’s quite the convenient stretc

> That person replaced gun with manhood implying that the person's manhood is derived from them power-tripping with weapons. That’s quite the convenient stretch. Pretty impressive how some people are amazing at reading subtext where non exists as long as it plays into their narrative. > Threatening violence IN RESPONSE to violence is a far cry from INSTIGATING violence against peace. I mean... police going after law makers isn’t exactly peaceful. But again, whatever fits your narrative is true and everything else is fakenews(TM).