> "hate speech" is a made up word Most words and phrases were made up, at some point. "Hate speech" still has a coherent meaning. > and neither illegal Nobod

> "hate speech" is a made up word Most words and phrases were made up, at some point. "Hate speech" still has a coherent meaning. > and neither illegal Nobody said it was illegal. YouTube is free to ban content creators that haven't broken the law. You agree to those terms when you use the site. > or "bad" I understand that the phrase "hate speech" confuses you. But these content creators openly advocate white supremacism. If you don't think that is "bad" I think you should take a deep look inward. > You're applauding Yes. > a rebranded social score No. YouTube is not assigning a "social score" - they are refusing to pay web hosting fees for racists. That has no effect on any other aspect of these people's lives - their ability to find jobs, make friends, start businesses, etc. is unaffected. > and a secondary justice system The comparison of YouTube consequences to the justice system is laughable. YouTube is saying "host your content elsewhere, there are lots of options." The justice system hands down things like forced confinement and the death penalty. There is really no comparison.