3 ms·
Yep. Phabricator kiiiinda has CI through Harbormaster, but it's not well documented and only sorta kinda works, and if I remember right, requires running arcani
by thaumaturgy 6y ago
Yep. Phabricator kiiiinda has CI through Harbormaster, but it's not well documented and only sorta kinda works, and if I remember right, requires running arcanist commands locally. It's way far behind what other platforms are doing.
- slezyr 6y agoAh, it reminds me of another issue - AWS-type naming (harbormaster, maniphest, phriction, diffusion, differential) I simply can't what are those without clicking them.
- thaumaturgy 6y agoThe naming style wasn't great, but you get used to it, like anything else. The architecture itself was beautiful; rather than trying to build a single monolithic application, the developers built a federated suite of applications that all shared a common architecture. This made it possible for the developers to treat each Phabricator component as a separate project and also allowed Phabricator administrators to set up a la carte configurations according to the organization's specific needs.
- evilelectron 6y agoAbsolutely, diff (Differential) based patch review is a great workflow for adding changes
- lima 6y agoHarbormaster works fine, though it requires a million clicks to set up. It can trigger automatically for new commits or new revisions. Gitlab is much better at the CI part, though, but significantly worse for code review.