The decision to nationalize/socialize something is always political. There is no intrinsic public aspect to anything. If there were only one food stall in the

The decision to nationalize/socialize something is always political. There is no intrinsic public aspect to anything. If there were only one food stall in the entire US, does that mean people aren't allowed to hunt, forage or grow their own food, or trade for it from someone who does? If so, then you've got a totally different problem on your hands: regulatory capture. If not, then refusing service to a person is very far from killing them. Edit: grammar