40 ms·
While I'm willing to engage in debate I don't see reductio ad absurdum as a valid argument.
by stillbourne 6y ago
While I'm willing to engage in debate I don't see reductio ad absurdum as a valid argument.
- ReptileMan 6y agoSCOTUS uses it regularly to create inventive decisions that defy common sense. Is it absurd chromium browsers to have a blacklist of hate sites to which it refuses to connect? It is google driven project. Private property. So yes - if you claim that you are lead by consistent rule based framework - finding the most extreme edge case makes sense (not saying that it makes good policy though) But declaring the digital monopolists as public fora is a good idea. California already does it with the private property of the malls. The public discourse is where the people are. No one should be forced to listen to you, but if person A wants to hear what person B wants to say - the platform C should have no right to interfere, just because they are medium. If you are platform - you should be dumb pipe should be valid on all levels of the osi model.