Understood: I agree with you. I'm not dismissing web browsing as if it's of secondary importance; I'm just saying it's not the only important thing. I believe y

Understood: I agree with you. I'm not dismissing web browsing as if it's of secondary importance; I'm just saying it's not the only important thing. I believe you when you say it's of overriding importance to you, and all you really need to know about an OS is whether you can have a standard web browsing experience. But that's not everyone, especially among people who might want to read about a "new" OS. I do more things with computers, for both fun and work, than use a web browser. I'm interested not only in what web browsing is like, but also what it's like to hack on a program, or configure the OS, or get a piece of hardware working, or produce digital art, or play a game, or make a game. I'm not saying the review is wrong; I'm saying it's incomplete. I'm pointing out that a better (more complete, fairer) review would answer not just the question of what users an OS is wrong for, but also at least tries to examine who it's right for.