> 'There aren’t really “superspreaders” as much as “superspreading events”.' the fundamental attribution error strikes again. also, you only need masks when y

> 'There aren’t really “superspreaders” as much as “superspreading events”.' the fundamental attribution error strikes again. also, you only need masks when you can't effectively distance (i.e., at potential superspreader events, like inside a bar, at a party, etc.). socialize this one key modification to the rules, and you'd get more compliance and less pushback, with at least the same reduced transmission rate. you don't need to lock down anything, just distance, and when you can't, mask. self-quarantine when sick. easy, and anxiety-free to boot.