3 ms·
> The idea behind Chernoff faces (or using faces for data visualization) seems good: we humans are very good at distinguishing faces Except that: 1. We humans
by ebg13 6y ago
> The idea behind Chernoff faces (or using faces for data visualization) seems good: we humans are very good at distinguishing faces
Except that:
1. We humans are actually _ABYSMAL_ at distinguishing faces (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-race_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-race_effect)
2. The ability to differentiate between two things and the ability to translate attributes into metrics are fundamentally so different from each other that any possible truth to the idea instantly becomes wildly irrelevant. https://eagereyes.org/criticism/chernoff-faces https://eagereyes.org/criticism/chernoff-faces
- sukilot 6y agoOne case of being imperfect isn't "abysmal". Cross facial discrimination is far more accurate than cross-species body discrimination, or wood grain discrimination, or many other things. There are brain regions detected to be dedicated to facial recognition.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]