3 ms·

Which part of Ebay refusing to do business in Romania is "ignoring courts"?

• mturmon 6y ago
  The grandparent comment (not the story) said some words about US companies not considering themselves "subservient to the government", and the child comment (the one you replied to) said "but these companies have to obey the courts." I'd say the GP comment over-reached by implying that a US company is not ultimately subject to US law. In principle, the companies do have to obey the courts, although in practice, there are multiple ways for companies to contest the power of a single court.
  • catalogia 6y ago
    If appealing to a higher court is what is meant by "ignoring courts and being a banana republic", that doesn't make much sense to me. What's the purpose of having higher courts to appeal to if not so that people or companies can do exactly that? To me, "ignoring a court" is contempt of court, and courts have mechanisms available to them to deal with it. It's the sort of thing people get tossed into prison for. Appealing things to higher courts is not contempt of court. But I don't see how any of this relates to a merchant refusing to do business in a country that neglects to prosecute thieves and scammers. I assume it's somehow meant to relate to that, since the conversation is threaded that way, but I can't work out the connection.