3 ms·

There is more context here: https://venturebeat.com/2020/06/26/ai-weekly-a-deep-learning-pioneers-teachable-moment-on-ai-bias/ https://venturebeat.com/2020/06/2

There is more context here: https://venturebeat.com/2020/06/26/ai-weekly-a-deep-learning-pioneers-teachable-moment-on-ai-bias/ https://venturebeat.com/2020/06/26/ai-weekly-a-deep-learning... I appreciated this response thread by Nicolas Le Roux on twitter: https://twitter.com/le_roux_nicolas/status/1275485736259792898 https://twitter.com/le_roux_nicolas/status/12754857362597928... especially this: "Why did you reply by repeating what you thought was true, even after many explicitly told you that what you believed to be true was incorrect?" ... "did you watch the tutorials or read the papers that were pointed to you. What did you think of them?"

itsoktocry 6y ago
>"did you watch the tutorials or read the papers that were pointed to you. What did you think of them?" As if he doesn't have better things to do then give opinions on people's papers and random tutorials about something he doesn't even disagree with. What would it accomplish? Also: "Fourth, you asked to assume good intent (https://twitter.com/ylecun/status/1275174556152586240 https://twitter.com/ylecun/status/1275174556152586240), which is known to maintain the balance of power" Asking to assume good intent is now a power move to the left? This is "known"? Awesome. Well, mission accomplished, Yann LeCun won't be participating in this discourse any more, and we're all better off, right?