> And the persons replying assumed that I had no idea about what I'm doing. Which isn't really nice. This is simply not true. Your original response strongly i

> And the persons replying assumed that I had no idea about what I'm doing. Which isn't really nice. This is simply not true. Your original response strongly implied that you were confusing decimal with floating point. If you reread your original reply strictly in the context of the original comment, you may notice what I'm talking about. The responses were just pointing out the difference, and doing so quite nicely I might add.