No. I don't think this is about that though. This isn't about a policy that costs money, and creates benefits. It's not even really a policy. It's a side effec

No. I don't think this is about that though. This isn't about a policy that costs money, and creates benefits. It's not even really a policy. It's a side effect of quasi-diplomatic arrangements created decades ago... with no relationship between original goals and current outcomes. Maybe it makes sense to subsidize a national package delivery. IF so, they can make a policy that does this, but this one isn't it.