4 ms·
Would users get a better service from the successors of YouTube? Would we have to watch more ads?
by silasdavis 6y ago
Would users get a better service from the successors of YouTube? Would we have to watch more ads?
- kevingadd 6y agoImpossible to know for sure, since any better service is going to get suffocated by Google's market power unless it's backed by another huge player like Amazon.
- SenHeng 6y agoThere's a freemium video service in japan called Nico Video [0] that has been around for about the same length of time as Youtube. On the free tier, you're essentially limited to a really shitty video quality, somewhere around 480p. It also has ads and some kind of rate limiting. Besides subscriptions, they also do tie-ups and other PR related stuff. Video quality has never really been that good even on the premium tier. Their whole selling point seems to be community interaction, where by viewers can post comments directly into the video stream [1]. As far as I can tell, they've been bleeding money for the last decade though they seemed to have turned a profit this year. My conclusion is that no, users would not get a better service. [0]: https://www.nicovideo.jp https://www.nicovideo.jp [1]: http://blog.nicovideo.jp/en_info/2013/01/post-037484.html http://blog.nicovideo.jp/en_info/2013/01/post-037484.html [2]: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ニコニコ動画#ビジネス https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ニコニコ動画#ビジネス