4 ms·
Shame we're limited to 16 colors...miss those title bar gradients :D Was this the pinnacle of UI design, or is nostalgia clouding our judgment?
by hyko 6y ago
Shame we're limited to 16 colors...miss those title bar gradients :D
Was this the pinnacle of UI design, or is nostalgia clouding our judgment?
- emilsedgh 6y agoIt was very usable. Performed incredibly well. And was boring as hell. I think it's the latter issue that drove it to it's doom.
- jfrunyon 6y agoManagement says: Easily usable interface with almost no confusion: bad, looks ugly. Barely usable interface with barely discernible elements: good, looks modern.
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 6y agoI wish it were only management that thought that way, but it seems like a lot of developers genuinely believe it too.
- ptx 6y agoI think the pinnacle must have been before the title bar gradients were added. They always annoyed me: is the title bar any less of a title bar towards the right? No? Then why does it fade out?
- steerablesafe 6y agoTo be fair the colors were configurable and you could easily get rid of the gradient. Remember doing that, but I'm not sure if it was win98.
- ptx 6y agoYup. Windows 95 had a solid color and Windows 98 added the gradient. You could set both colors to the same one to make it solid again.
- derefr 6y agoThe color is a background for the text. It fades out because the bar stops being about showing the title text, and starts being about showing window controls, that exist as buttons with their own backgrounds and borders. Sort of like how desktop icons have text with a blur-extruded drop-shadow. It fades out at the point where text is no longer shown.
- ptx 6y agoThe title is shown in the entire title bar (e.g. long titles for web pages) all the way until it reaches the buttons, which as you say have their own border, so there is no gradual change in its character. It's 100% draggable and 100% showing text all the way, so the form (showing gradual change) is at odds with the function (sharp distinction between title and buttons).