3 ms·
Screw actual prices! Charge more for bad things. If there are extra taxes on tobacco and alcohol, there can damn sure be extra taxes on junk mail. Let's start
by myself248 6y ago
Screw actual prices! Charge more for bad things.
If there are extra taxes on tobacco and alcohol, there can damn sure be extra taxes on junk mail. Let's start at 5000% and adjust from there.
Or, put some sort of escrow/credit/thing in the opt-out mechanism. Where the sender has to swear on a stack of dollars that I actually want this. And if I do actually want this, cool, I keep receiving it, they keep their money. But if I opt out, then the sender forfeits their bet, and next time it's more expensive for them. This would incentivize senders to make their mailings carefully chosen or highly valuable (think bribes to the recipient), or both.
Really, what I want is a postal equivalent of that "button that shocks the shit out of someone on the internet". I would just lean a brick on the button until the junkmailers have smoke coming out their ears.
- perpetualpatzer 6y ago> there can damn sure be extra taxes on junk mail. I'd imagine this would actually be quite difficult on first amendment grounds if you start filtering by sender / message contents and would sweep in things like paychecks if you don't.
- ericmay 6y agoI agree. I'd also say though that it might hasten digital adoption for some things - if a company had to pay extra to send a paycheck, they'd make you sign up for direct deposit. The lasting effect might be that those who are underbanked might be "forced" into digital bank accounts. That is, until they come to tax email.