3 ms·
Their transcode, storage, and compute costs are what lead me to also believe YouTube is not profitable, or just barely profitable.
by AndrewUnmuted 6y ago
Their transcode, storage, and compute costs are what lead me to also believe YouTube is not profitable, or just barely profitable.
- markdown 6y agoIf those costs were high they'd have long ago banned the spam accounts that upload autogenerated garbage.
- ijpsud 6y ago"[In Q3 2018] YouTube removed about 1.67 million channels and all of the 50.2 million videos that were available from them. Nearly 80% of the channel takedowns related to spam uploads, YouTube said." https://www.businessinsider.com/r-youtube-under-pressure-for-problem-content-takes-down-58-million-videos-in-quarter-2018-12 https://www.businessinsider.com/r-youtube-under-pressure-for... The remaining 20% were apparently taken down due to nudity and other policy violations. To be clear: I have no idea whether they're profitable or not. Just pointing out this article.
- markdown 6y agoThanks.