> Also, there is a weakness in testing, namely that even racialists think things like intelligence are partly non-shared environment, so if you set a lower bar

> Also, there is a weakness in testing, namely that even racialists think things like intelligence are partly non-shared environment, so if you set a lower bar filter from a population with lower average IQ, then while the people you get will meet your threshhold, their children would often not (assuming this supposed genetic difference exists), which is relevant to immigration rules. So are we going to kick out in-group children from the country when their IQ scores aren't high enough? No? Then that is a a bad argument. Also, I have been trying to avoid the whole debate on what IQ test actually measure...