The payoffs are in the pattern overlapping. Try to read it that way and you’ll see how he/she keeps aligning the parallels until it’s clear. Pretty good read,

The payoffs are in the pattern overlapping. Try to read it that way and you’ll see how he/she keeps aligning the parallels until it’s clear. Pretty good read, I just disagree with the conclusion (final paragraphs). One could argue the article itself is an inverting of the narrative of the narrative, and thus has nothing left to say. I’m going to confuse myself here I feel, but the article as analysis, if I’m right about itself being an inversion, has to be taken as non-analysis and just a description ultimately. It’s got nothing left to say because there’s really nothing left to say. /meta