3 ms·
It costs significantly less to send a lightweight package, via the USPS, from China to the U.S. than it does to send it within the U.S. There's no reason Ameri
by cameldrv 6y ago
It costs significantly less to send a lightweight package, via the USPS, from China to the U.S. than it does to send it within the U.S.
There's no reason American taxpayers and postal rate payers should be subsidizing shipping costs for Chinese Ebay/Amazon merchants at the expense of their American competitors.
- lazylizard 6y agoAmerican taxpayers are ok with subsidizing themselves buying cheap stuff from aliexpress pinduoduo and taobao maybe?
- cameldrv 6y agoNo they're not. The reason it's so cheap is that the UPU forced the U.S. to offer these rates. As a result, the U.S. threatened to leave the UPU so that the USPS could adjust the rates to be more equitable.
- mcv 6y agoOnce upon a time, the US agreed to these rates, because at the time they were reasonable. The idea was that developing countries would be held back if they had to pay the full cost of international mail. To help them, the relatively low volume of mail from developing countries would be subsidised a bit by the country it was mailed to. But China isn't a developing country anymore; it's the #2 economy of the world. And the volume isn't small either. The rule should not apply to them, but it's hard to change.