3 ms·

Also works the other way. Violence against peaceful BLM protesters and journalists counts as one example. To me it is simple, if all they have is speech, speech

Also works the other way. Violence against peaceful BLM protesters and journalists counts as one example. To me it is simple, if all they have is speech, speech minus a call to action,it should be tolerated. If an action is taken or suggested then rules to regulate that action or intent apply. Conspiracy laws exist for a reason.

DuskStar 6y ago
Oh, of course. Violence to counter speech is unacceptable. Even with a call to action. (A call to action also needs to be specific - "lynch John Doe at 123 Main Street" - and timely - "tomorrow night" - to be outside first amendment protection in the US by my understanding)