4 ms·
On mobile it's very difficult to read because the font is too small and line width is too long, so I have to choose between squinting or scrolling back and fort
by smichel17 6y ago
On mobile it's very difficult to read because the font is too small and line width is too long, so I have to choose between squinting or scrolling back and forth and back and forth and.. (or use Firefox's reader mode). I don't mind plain text, but this site is several orders of magnitude harder to read than http://motherfuckingwebsite.com http://motherfuckingwebsite.com
- komali2 6y agoWoah really? It rendered just like motherfuckingwebsite for me on mobile. edit: I was using readermode lol. The site does not look good at all on mobile.
- shanemhansen 6y agoOn mobile it's really easy for me to read. Don't is at a natural size and lines wrap appropriately. [edit] Oh I see it looks bad in Firefox on mobile. Fair enough.
- lordgrenville 6y agoIt's pretty uncomfortable to read on desktop, too - at least on my large monitor - since there are no margins.
- smichel17 6y agoI do most of my HN browsing in the app [Materialistic], so I usually first look at articles using the built-in webview, then open externally in Firefox if that doesn't render correctly (which is unfortunately common. Not sure why, but I'm inclined to blame either the app or webview; for example, Wikipedia is served as a static site but renders as a blank page). In this case, they both rendered the same way (but was able to read the page with FF's reader mode). [Materialistic]: https://f-droid.org/en/packages/io.github.hidroh.materialistic/ https://f-droid.org/en/packages/io.github.hidroh.materialist...