3 ms·
They were reporting the opinion of many contrarian scientists and doctors. If they are liable for that then they could also be held liable for reporting on, for
by rpiguy 6y ago
They were reporting the opinion of many contrarian scientists and doctors. If they are liable for that then they could also be held liable for reporting on, for example, science that denies climate change.
Not to mention the fact that the press as a whole spent two months telling us it was nothing before it became they decided it wasn’t.
No Fox isn’t liable and if you think spreading what you deem is misinformation is a crime you are a Facist.
- creato 6y agoI think what makes fox different is they internally believe the threat is serious and are respecting various guidelines for controlling the virus, and then encourage everyone else to thumb their noses at such measures: https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/05/12/fox-news-staffers-will-continue-working-from-home-through-mid-june-according-to-new-memo/ https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/05/12/fox-news-staffers-wil...