6 ms·
One of the biggest, if not the biggest, problem of online courses is cheating on tests. And yes, students cheat. I'm talking here about Physics, but I assume i
by davrosthedalek 6y ago
One of the biggest, if not the biggest, problem of online courses is cheating on tests. And yes, students cheat.
I'm talking here about Physics, but I assume it's similar in other disciplines of the hard sciences.
This is less so a problem for higher classes -- you can write take-home problems which are hard and uncommon enough that you can't google-solve them. But even then, students will solve them in a team. Or in other words: The best students will solve it, and everybody will have the solution.
For lower classes, almost by definition, the problems are all textbook. Yes, you can change numbers around, and formulations, but with some google-fu, most problems are shallow :)
The situation gets even harder if you want to be fair to the students who are not on campus. How good is their internet? How do you handle "my internet went down"? Or: I'm in this other timezone, your test is in the middle of the night! What I did in the last semester is allow the students to take the test at any time of the day, and give ample time for the test itself. But of course, that gives them more chance to communicate, and help each other. Even randomized tests (i.e. with changing numbers) do not help here, because often the complication is finding the right formula. Putting in other numbers is then trivial.
There are only proctored exams, but they only help if you use a locked down browser. I'd rather not put what amounts to spyware onto my students computers. AND they are pretty easy to fool anyway.
The only way around that are taking tests in testing centers. But there is an issue of scale here, especially in COVID times.
The second problem is lab classes. It's very hard to teach experimental setup techniques online. How do you use a scope? Can you find a bad connection? Why did this resistor just blow up? You let the students play with sometimes quite expensive equipment, you can not expect them to just have that at home.
Third, online teaching is a very bad experience for many students. Not so much of the class itself -- I think this can often be remedied. But things like the exchange with other students, the opportunity to ask the professor face to face, but also so basic things like having to get up and out of your room for class instead of watching it (or a recording) from your bed. Not all, but many students struggled hard to motivate themselves to study sitting at home.
I do believe that it's better to have no in-person classes, or maybe a bare minimum. Teachers will try to teach the students as best as possible, but make no mistake, the education of many students will suffer.
- throwaway6734 6y ago>There are only proctored exams, but they only help if you use a locked down browser. I'd rather not put what amounts to spyware onto my students computers. AND they are pretty easy to fool anyway. Couldn't they also just use a second computer?
- kfriede 6y agoOften times these browsers also require microphone and webcam access and track eye movement. Huge privacy violation, but I also don't have a proposal on an alternative other than proctored in-person tests.
- davrosthedalek 6y agoYes, or their phone. I mean, they could monitor your eyes with the webcam, and if you start rummaging on a different keyboard/mouse and looking away, this might be detected. But a phone? Easy to hide! What do you do if they want to go to the restroom? Additionally, it puts another "barrier of entry" in there: Rich kids can buy more electronics to cheat better. Or pay somebody to do the manipulation for them.
- nocman 6y agoAll of the proctored exams I've ever been aware of have either a human supervisor in the room at all times, and/or a video camera pointed at the student the whole time. If you open a second computer they should know about it.
- nitrogen 6y agoKVM switch with PIP?
- hirundo 6y agoSoon, a locked down VR headset with eye tracking. It's step one for the matrix, maybe, but it does make it hard for the student to check their phone. But employers will be tempted to use the same tech to measure employee time-on-task, and write employment contracts accordingly. Parents and teachers would want to use it to monitor study as well as exams. The potential for social control is rather alarming.