3 ms·
Yeah, I thought that "award-winning" bit was at best superfluous, and the article overall in typical ddj style. I don't care for their style in general: "too c
by maw 18y ago
Yeah, I thought that "award-winning" bit was at best superfluous, and the article overall in typical ddj style. I don't care for their style in general: "too corporate" is a short way to phrase it, but I think my dislike goes deeper than that, even if I can't put my finger exactly on whatever it is that irks me.
But, to be fair, they did mention hg and git, albeit in passing.
- undees 18y agoExcept that they didn't even quite get that right. The article seems to contrast git and hg's versioning schemes, when in reality they're both hashes of the content (the non-unique hg version numbers referred to are merely local aliases).