I was thinking of Hancock when I wrote the post. One of the major problems with this particular idea is that the number of things that would have to be wrong i

I was thinking of Hancock when I wrote the post. One of the major problems with this particular idea is that the number of things that would have to be wrong is so large, we're essentially talking about rewriting everything from scratch. It's on roughly the same level as geocentrism at this point. The advocates rarely if ever point out real evidence and instead claim things like gobekli tepe (or worse, yonaguni) support their argument based on very deep misunderstandings.