4 ms·
It's interesting, a shame emacs org-mode is discarded so quickly. If only the barrier of entry weren't so high.
by inakarmacoma 6y ago
It's interesting, a shame emacs org-mode is discarded so quickly. If only the barrier of entry weren't so high.
- rhabarba 6y agoThe author implies that vi/Vim and an Emacs are the usual suspects here, but they’re rather foreign on Windows and DOS-like environments - which is true. Other editors in the list are - at least, UI/UX-wise - much more common to DOS people.
- yellowapple 6y agoEmacs has a CUA mode to address that specific issue: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/CUA-Bindings.html https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/CU...
- rhabarba 6y agoIt still feels rather different than (e.g.) TSE. Don’t misunderstand me, I surely like Emacs and I use it regularly, but the command-line version is a strange thing in a DOS environment.